User:Rmhermen
 | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
| Action | Count |
|---|---|
| Edits | 61500 |
| Edits+Deleted | 64857 |
| Pages deleted | 3958 |
| Revisions deleted | 14 |
| Pages restored | 30 |
| Pages protected | 80 |
| Pages unprotected | 9 |
| Protections modified | 23 |
| Users blocked | 101 |
| Users reblocked | 1 |
| User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 2405:201:6006:9188:acef:5d37:4868:7b33 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:8a0:766e:7a00:21b5:c1dd:f64:b3ea (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1308 (LTA 1308, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. SpencerT•C 20:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2409:40c2:109:eb00:a4ab:37ff:fe9a:602d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Spacejazz2013 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:28, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. SpencerT•C 20:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 99.255.207.89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Dekadoka (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:28, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- NedBoomerson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Troll or otherwise only here for disruptive editing. I count 7 warning templates and some more non-template warnings on their talk page. All their article edits had to be reverted except for two minor edits (1, 2). mfb (talk) 15:51, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 108.49.177.166 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Does nothing other than adding "singer-songwriter" to dozen articles. FMSky (talk) 18:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 5.51.122.195 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism within 1 day of being unblocked. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 20:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:4808:88D0:4300:2DE1:E18F:2688:7F2F (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) 2600:4808:88D0:4300:5C14:2EE3:E87A:445C (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Two more IP socks of this blocked user. A range block of 2600:4808:88D0:4300::/64 would probably be best. Please also roll back the edits. Thanks! — Chrisahn (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Lindsey.whiteman (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "color terminology for race" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Color terms for race are sometimes associated with racism, but many usernames with them are benign — make sure this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- DookieButter69 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Idioticpet (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "idiot" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:30, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- IceAgeCollisionCourse1046 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Drexler077 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Mypersonalblogg21 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Trumpjr101 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:30, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:30, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 19:30, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: IP edit warring over ungrammatical content and uncited additions, in addition to blanking {{cn}}. Not cut-and-dry vandalism, but rapidly up against 3RR with zero responses to direct attempts at engagement. This article has a history of edit warring and block evasion from IP editors, I don’t know if that’s what’s happening here. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 14:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Very High level of IP vandalism. It's also under a contentious topicXiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 15:36, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant violations of the WP:NOTFORUM rule, as well as insertion of spammy comments in general. OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Salt the earth - Repeatedly re-created, target of a spammer sockmaster (Simodabir0). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Salt the earth - Repeatedly re-created via move from draft, target of a spammer sockmaster (Simodabir0). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is currently attracting a large amount of vandalism and WP:BLP violations from a number of IP addresses. Opolito (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 20:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WMF-banned user edit warring with proxies, see sulutil:IBARSKI KOLASIN as well for reference. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 20:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing(see hist), high-risk page. And yes, there is enough disruptive activity to justify protection. RaschenTechner (talk) 20:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Monophile/Archive and [1]. Protecting S Chacko and Shibu Chacko MBE might also be necessary. Badbluebus (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An autoconfirmed WP:SPA is repeatedly adding copyrighted content to the page. I am involved and wish to avoid edit warring, but have been discussing with the editor on their talk page. The most obvious copyvio is with this page. This article has been subject to repeated COI and paid editing before, both disclosed and undisclosed. —Ganesha811 (talk) 21:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government
[edit]- Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors kept on adding Trump "Declare that all Americans are now legally female. Cassiopeia talk 02:23, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Cassiopeia: I believe you want the talk page semi-protected (the article is already indefinitely semi-protected). I'll leave that for other opinions but a quick look makes me think there is not enough disruptive activity to warrant that? The meme is silly and if it really is added frequently, semi would be justified but it currently appears to be just a couple of IPs commenting reasonably (well it would be reasonable if the meme weren't silly). Johnuniq (talk) 02:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page was deleted for inactivity but is now active and we would like to make it undeleted. Girls Town Jerusalem (talk) 08:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Girls Town Jerusalem: You're in the wrong location. Try WP:Requests for undeletion - but I note that you will likely be blocked for username if you do. We do not allow usernames that imply shared or official use. In addition, if you are working for Girls Town Jerusalem, you are obligated to disclose that relationship per the Terms of Use. Finally, I have a feeling you wouldn't be able to edit this article or draft in the first place anyway. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:28, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don’t see a deleted page at either of the links above. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
After the "For other wikis, check the Meta oversight page..." sentence, add "If the wiki on which you are requesting oversight does not have a local oversight team, email the stewards using this form." I can't post this on User talk:Oversight, as that is a fully-protected redirect to the user page. JJPMaster (she/they) 14:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia states Bobby Orr's family was paid 10,000 dollars at signing. On page 69 of his book he states they were paid 1,000.00 dollars. 99.255.207.89 (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done The 10,000 figure never appears in the article, either as a number or written-out. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 07:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 8 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 13:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards. I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit] |
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: I need it because I'm making an article and need an fair photo Sheagolddigger (talk) 03:36, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at the near-permanent New Pages Feed backlog, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the relevant content policies and guidelines, especially when it comes to NPOV and BLP. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. As for my own record, I have created over 600 articles so far, with few deleted. I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting NPR rights to help maintain the quality of new pages and ensure Wikipedia’s standards. I will handle this role responsibly. I understand Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and content policies like WP:NPOV and reliable sourcing. I’m also aware of the need to prevent spam, promotional content, and poorly sourced articles. Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello I am interested in contributing more to wikipedia. I've been editing pages for about 8 years. I can edit in Croatian and Ukrainian as well. Barrettsprivateers (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Due to the inactivity the rights were revoked, would like to reinstate these rights. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 06:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting to extend my NPP flag. I enjoyed reviewing redirects and articles. Thanks GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I have had page mover temporarily since November 2024. I believe I have made good use of it, and since it will expire automatically in a week I am here to request it be extended. I have handled around eighty requests at WP:RM/TR link and closed a few RMs. As far as I remember, the only conflict was about my close of an RM at Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (discussion can be found on my Talk page). Toadspike [Talk] 17:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
I think I meet all the criteria, I have been an editor for more than 6 months, I have over 3000 edits, I have participated in more than 50 move requests, and I've never been blocked. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Recently active back at RM for the past three months after being extremely active many years ago. I was brought to MR twice in 2013 & 2015 and in both cases my closure was endorsed. I have !voted recently in most of the recent months of MR and always aligned with consensus. Spent the last three months getting reacquainted with the changes in policy and approaches to RM's and have started to perform some closures. Would appreciate the bit to help reduce the need for CSD#G6 and/or RM/TR to complete some of these moves. Thanks! TiggerJay (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I mainly edit articles on biology, particularly fishes. I frequently (over 300 times so far, I am told) have to request a move of the only species in a monotypic genus from the species name to the genus name,as per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA, over a redirect, and would like to be able to do this without having to request a move. Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm very active on Wikipedia, with over 2,100 edits, and I'm well acquainted with WP:VAND and what vandalism is not. I can contribute to reducing backlogs by reviewing pending changes. Mr.Hanes |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements. Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting. Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I am re-requesting rollback after being denied around the end of December for not being consistent enough in RC patrol to meet the criteria. I understand that now and have come back with hopefully having reverted obvious and blatant vandalism more consistently over the past month. As always, I assume good faith, and when it comes to recent changes, if I see something that I'm not quite sure is vandalism or not, I won't undo it. I am well-versed in the different warning templates and when to use each one, and I know when it is appropriate to report to WP:AIV. Rollback will help me quickly undo the very obvious and problematic vandalism that I might catch on RC. Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
 |
WP:AIV |  |
WP:ANI |  |
WP:NPP |  |
WP:RPP |  |
WP:RFR |  |
WP:AFD |  |
WP:XFD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
CAT:CSD |  |
WP:CSD |  |
WP:RM |  |
WP:RAA |  |
WP:DR |  |
WP:TM |  |
WP:TT | ||||||
 |
WP:RCU |  |
WP:LOP |  |
CAT:AB |  |
WP:BS |  |
WP:RD |  |
WP:NFC |  |
WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [6] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]
Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system
